A Pleasure to Have in Class
By Cindy
Reitzi
February 2004
In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.
– Einstein
Nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it so. – Shakespeare
Hope springs eternal. – unknown
We all have difficult students whom we mentally calculate
as “not a pleasure to have in class”: they challenge everything
you say, get “involved” every time you redirect another
student, and need to be told five times to do anything.
Initially, “Nate” radiated “hapless
slacker.” His long-term plan for life constituted charming manners
substituting for actual hard work, thereby allowing him to get by smoothly
on minimal effort and earning maximal grades. It wasn’t working.
His personality was neither adept at charming nor brilliant enough to
get by on minimal effort. His “suave” conversation was sprinkled
with expletives. Swearing was not verbal assault; it was punctuation.
And in high school, that’s a qualitative difference in cussing.
He wasn’t mean, just frustrating.
He also had the unfortunate habit of discussing drunk
driving, crack and drugs in a positive, joking manner which tended to
alienate teachers who were, in his mind, overly “touchy”
about such subjects. With all of his referrals to the office, Nate and
his principal, a forbearing man, were becoming close personal friends.
Other teachers usually offered some caution or warning when they saw
his name. The image “conniving weasel” emerged among these
various brush strokes.
But as it turned out, Nate had many redeeming qualities
that actually contributed to his resilience. He had an all-or-nothing
personality (all-slacking or all-out work) that came in handy at crunch
time. He had a good sense of humor and enjoyed sarcasm (even when he
was the target), respected effective use of authority (people who saved
him from himself), never suffered from denial of his “crimes”
(once caught), and most of all, didn’t hold a grudge (at least
with me).
This was workable pedagogy since his bad habits weren’t
so entrenched in blaming others that he couldn’t improve. Still,
Nate started a pattern of coming in late without passes and leaving
class without permission. I politely told him to desist; he ignored
me. Finally, one day while I was conferencing with another student,
he left again without permission. This time I confronted him angrily.
Up to now, Nate was affable enough; suddenly, his evil twin emerged.
We had words. He offered lame excuses: another teacher gave him passes
to the LMC during my class, and the most absurd, “All my teachers
let me leave without permission.” I was steamed.
Later, I also noticed missing passes (Nate sat next
to my desk). So, I got creative and communicative. I got his schedule,
and wrote a note to all his teachers. Since he had no study hall, he
needed no passes. I also mentioned “coincidentally” that
passes were missing (in diplomatic passive voice). I also alerted the
library. Teachers stopped giving him passes. The library became wary.
I closed off all exits at school. Nate had to stay in class.
Afterwards, he skipped. Since I didn’t want
him going down the bathroom drain grade spiral, I called home. His dad
mentioned Nate came home early that day because of our school assembly.
There was no school assembly. I, in turn, relayed the missing passes
coincidence and Nate’s seating arrangement. His father informed
me he’d take care of it; he sounded convincing. Now, Nate’s
exits were blocked at home.
Some students would be furious. Not Nate. After all
that, Nate didn’t hold a grudge. In fact, I heard him semi-bragging
that I had kicked his butt, so to speak. Nate’s psychology was
puzzling, but it probably went something like this:
- Ms. Reitzi caught me, so she’s not stupid.
- She busted me with everyone. She takes no prisoners. I can respect
that.
- She cares enough to bust me.
Shortly afterward, I was doing grades. Out of pique, whimsy, evil humor,
or even, wish fulfillment, I filled in the comment: “A pleasure
to have in class” for Nate. Days later, Nate came to class laughing.
“Man, Ms. Reitzi, you said I was a pleasure to have in class.
My dad laughed his butt off when he saw that.”
Even when reminded of the “passes debacle,” Nate was good-humored.
In a fit of twisted humor, I taped a note in my desk drawer that said,
“Nate, stay out of my desk!” One day I opened the drawer
and he saw the note.
“Man, Ms. Reitzi . . . That is so funny, man.”
As the semester progressed, Nate attempted to surface from the ocean
bottom of F’s he accumulated from late papers. When we started
research papers, I told Nate I didn’t want a late paper riddled
with mechanical errors.
“You’re a hard grader, Ms. Reitzi.” Hand over heart,
I replied dramatically, “I have standards.”
Then, one day the light bulb blinked. “You’re dyslexic,”
I said.
“Well,” he replied in true Nate fashion, “would my
papers look like hell if I wasn’t?”
“Good point, but then get help BEFORE you turn it in. I’ll
help you. Go to the Writing Lab. There’s no reason why your final
draft should look like a train wreck. Everybody needs editors.”
As it turned out, Nate’s passion was history. Not surprisingly,
he wrote about Attila the Hun. He posited the sunny side of “The
Scourge of God.”
Turning in his paper before winter break, Nate gave me presents and
a card. Inside he wrote, “Remember Ms. Reitzi, ‘F’
stands for favorite student.” I laughed aloud. Maybe he was becoming
a pleasure to have in class. …
After break, Nate crunched the numbers to determine his grade. Between
an A research paper and rewrites, incredibly, Nate had slogged from
an F to an A. Ecstatic, Nate loudly cussed his grade, “(Expletive),
I got a (expletive) A!” The other students looked at him with
renewed respect.
“Gee, Nate,” I commented, “you’re my greatest
success story.”
“Hey, Ms. Reitzi,” he replied, “maybe you should
write about me.”
Posted February 3, 2004