When Good Teachers Lie
By Cindy
Reitzi
March 2003
Forget the conventional wisdom that teachers are role
models whom students trust. Good teachers lie. Really. And they have good
pedagogical reasons to do so. Like teaching critical thinking.
My friend, Bruce, now semi-retired, taught reading for more than 30 years
to everyone from gifted students to students who never read a book until
he got hold of them. He has met everyone from the enthusiastic to the
totally apathetic when it comes to reading.
He is famous for getting kids to read and to think about
what theyre reading. He also actively teaches critical thinking
skills using logic puzzles, twisted syntax, and various other exercises.
Hes what many consider to be a great teacher. And he lies to his
students.
He once had a class that didnt question anything.
The students were good kids, but they passively accepted everything Bruce
told them. And for Bruce, that meant they werent learning much.
One day when they were reading and analyzing a short story, he decided
he was tired of their intellectual passivity. So he started making things
up. He fabricated characters in the story; he recalled events that never
happened, and conflicts that didnt exist. He got more and more outrageous
until a timid voice finally suggested that the students and Bruce were
probably reading different stories.
Uh
Mr. Piddington? That didnt happen
in the story.
Thank you, Bruce acknowledged, finally!
As it dawned on his class that their teacher had just
(gasp) lied to them and that, knowing Mr. Piddington, he might just lie
to them again in the future and that all the educational bedrock they
had counted on with teachers up to this point (boring but truthful) was
not on a foundation of granite but flaky shale, they started paying attention.
And indeed throughout the year they began to view their teacher
and the information he gave them suspiciously and with a critical
eye. Bruce was known to give wrong answers on quizzes and in discussions
(on purpose). And his students became smart enough to know that he was
doing this to make them think and question.
While Bruce is a proficient liar, for sheer audacity
theres my friend Mike, a social studies teacher with a reputation
for telling tall tales, exaggerating, and dramatizing the truth. He is
of the mind that if youre going to lie, make it a whopper. Everyone
knows to take him with a grain of salt. Nonetheless, he once convinced
many of his 9th graders (and this could work on 10th graders, too) that
the world was black and white before 1960.
We had some shades of violet and gray, but in
general things were black and white. Things changed to color when there
was a solar flare on the sun in 1960.
Aw, cmon Mr. Sullivan
a few
skeptics began.
Being the good historian, Mike offered proof. Well,
look at old TV shows before 1960. What color were they? Black and white.
Look at old photos in your history book or your family photos. Black and
white.
Being the Visual Culture Generation, most kids thought
he had a point. Of course, not everyone was fooled. A few smiling co-conspirators
looked around, saw that the fish were nibbling and kept their mouths shut
to let the practical joke unravel. To further the conspiracy, Mike enlisted
the help of other teachers.
If you dont believe me, ask your science
teachers. Theyll tell you.
And so they did. Who told you that? asked
one science teacher.
Sullivan.
Yup, thats right. The Solar Flare of 1960.
Everything changed to color back then. Yeah, its true. The world
was black and white before that.
There. Two conniving teachers had confirmed this lie
so it must be true. (This is how propaganda works).
Some skeptics went home and asked their parents. The
evil parents (after holding in their laughter) confirmed that, indeed,
there had been a solar flare and probably whipped out the black and white
pictures in the family album to further confuse their gullible children.
(See, pictures dont lie).
It took his students about two weeks to figure out that
theyd been had. The betrayal was even more pronounced because the
truth was easy to find. A friendly librarian could have easily proved
that there was no such historical/scientific event as The Solar Flare
of 1960 and sent the kids off with friendly advice not to believe everything
Mr. Sullivan told them.
Once the betrayed students figured it out, they collectively
decided well never believe anything you say again, which
was a good thing. After that, whenever Mike said anything history-related,
they were immediately suspicious.
I dont believe you. Are you making that
up? Then theyd dive into their books and check the facts.
And probably for the first time in the annals of social studies instruction,
they actually read their history books.
Now, if we could just get them to be more skeptical
about their textbooks
Posted March 10, 2003