Wisconsin a National Leader in Teacher Quality, Standards
Education Week report ignores major
efforts and advances
A magazine report that gives low grades to Wisconsin's
efforts to improve teacher quality and develop standards for students
overlooks factors that actually make this state a national leader in these
areas, WEAC President Terry Craney said Wednesday (January 10, 2001).
"The bottom line is that our students are performing
well, our teachers are excellent and getting better, and our schools are
among the best in the nation," Craney said. "This report itself cites
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results in which Wisconsin
students consistently score among the best in the nation. That reflects
ACT, SAT and other assessments."
Education Week's annual "Quality Counts" report gives
Wisconsin poor grades in the categories of "Improving Teacher Quality"
and "Standards and Assessments."
However, it virtually ignores the fact that Wisconsin
already has adopted and is implementing strong measures that address the
teacher professional development issues raised by the report.
With WEAC's direct involvement and support, Wisconsin
is in the process of implementing an improved teacher licensing system.
Some provisions have already gone into effect, but most, including a three-tier
licensure system, go into effect July 1, 2004. Because these major changes
have not yet been fully implemented, Education Week apparently chose to
completely ignore them. In its 1999 report, the magazine gave the state
a B in this category because of these efforts.This year it didn't even
take them into account.
In addition, Education Week used arbitrary criteria
to measure the quality of academic standards and assessments.
"Quality Counts takes the inexplicable position that
standards and assessments are meaningless unless there is a single statewide,
high-stakes 'one size fits all' dictum imposed on all local school districts
by the state," Craney said. "Wisconsin citizens have wisely chosen not
to go that route. In Wisconsin, we have a carefully and thoughtfully developed
standards and assessments process that provides guidance at the state
level but flexibility at the local level. Under this comprehensive system,
local districts determine, within certain bounds, exactly what standards
they want in their communities.
"In addition, Wisconsin citizens have wisely chosen
not to make high school graduation dependent solely on a single high-stakes
graduation test," Craney added. "We have chosen to make such a test one
element in determining eligibility for graduation. We have carefully and
extensively discussed this issue in this state and come up with an approach
that works best for Wisconsin."
In the category of "Adequacy of Resources," Education
Week's grade of A for Wisconsin reflects a serious misunderstanding of
the school finance situation in Wisconsin, Craney said.
"Just ask the citizens of Waukesha who are struggling
to cut $2.4 million from their school district budget right now," Craney
said. "They are looking at cutting some 30 staff positions. And this is
occurring in large and small districts throughout the state. Education
Week may juggle some numbers at an office in Washington, D.C., and determine
our schools are adequately funded. But the teachers, support staff, parents,
and students in our schools know that is absolutely not the case. Revenue
controls are causing serious financial problems for our schools.
"Wisconsin has great schools and great teachers and
support staff. We have set up a comprehensive new teacher professional
development process and developed a process for raising academic standards
to make our schools even greater," Craney said. "But the funding crisis
we are facing under revenue controls is threatening to undermine all of
our progress."
Education Week Web site
Posted January 11, 2001