skip to main navigation skip to demographic navigationskip to welcome messageskip to quicklinksskip to features
  • Continue Your Membership
  • WEAC Member Benefits

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Religious Voucher Challenge

The U.S. Supreme Court Monday (November 9, 1998) refused to hear a challenge to the expansion of the Milwaukee private school voucher program to religious schools.

WEAC, the Milwaukee Teachers' Education Association and the NAACP, among others, had appealed the case to the nation’s highest court, claiming the expansion was unconstitutional.

In June, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the expansion of the Milwaukee private school voucher program to religious schools was constitutional. That 4-2 ruling overturned a 1997 State Appeals Court ruling. The Appeals Court had ruled that the inclusion of religious schools violated the "separation of church and state" provisions of the Wisconsin Constitution. The Appeals Court ruling had affirmed a lower court ruling by Dane County Circuit Judge Paul Higginbotham.

The expansion allows as many as 15,000 Milwaukee students from low-income families to attend private and religious schools at state expense. Previously, the Milwaukee voucher program allowed participating students to only attend non-religious private schools.

Despite the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the debate over the religious school voucher issue will not disappear, WEAC President Terry Craney said.

“We will continue to oppose the expansion of the voucher system and we will wait for another opportunity to raise the federal issues in question,” Craney said.

Craney said the true victims of the voucher system are the children of Wisconsin.

“Money to finance voucher schools comes from funds available for public education,” he said. “According to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Milwaukee Public Schools will lose more than $25 million in state funds this year alone because state money will be redirected to voucher schools. MPS will be forced to increase class sizes, make program cuts or increase property taxes to make up for the loss. That is a choice no one should have to make.”

Craney noted the Supreme Court’s action did not mean the justices would have ruled against WEAC’s position opposing vouchers.

“The decision says nothing about vouchers’ ultimate constitutionality,” he said. “It is unfortunate Wisconsin children must wait for another case to vindicate their First Amendment rights. We believe Wisconsin children and the Constitution would have been best served by the court agreeing to hear this matter. This would have been an excellent case to once and for all decide the future of vouchers for religious education.”

Posted November 9, 1998