skip to main navigation skip to demographic navigationskip to welcome messageskip to quicklinksskip to features

Local School Districts Can't Match WSVH Services

A new survey reveals that few local school districts have the resources and services available to serve visually impaired students as well as the Wisconsin School for the Visually Handicapped in Janesville, two legislators said.

State Representative Wayne W. Wood (D-Janesville) and State Senator Timothy Weeden (R-Beloit) oppose a proposal by State Superintendent John Benson to close the school at the end of this academic year. The Legislature is reviewing Benson's proposal.

Wood and Weeden sent a questionnaire to the superintendents of all 426 school districts in the state.

"We've had a response rate of over 45%, and with few exceptions, most local school districts are not able to offer services equivalent to those found at WSVH," Weeden stated.

"The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) has recommended closing WSVH, even though it admits students now at the school will not receive better educational opportunities in their local district," Wood noted. "We felt a survey was needed to determine just how prepared those districts are to educate visually impaired students who often have other severe handicaps."

The legislators asked about the number of visually impaired students served by each district and tried to determine what types of services and programs were currently available to educate these students.

Only four districts provide a wide range of comprehensive services to visually handicapped students on a daily basis. Most districts offer itinerant services, either through the local Cooperative Educational Service Agency (CESA) or through teacher aids. That means visually impaired children might receive specialized instruction for only an hour or two per week.

"Well over half of the administrators who responded indicated they had visually impaired students in their school systems," said Wood. "Yet, according to the survey, only a small percentage of districts have specialized programs for these children."

Fewer than 7% of the districts reported offering Braille instruction. About 13% provide orientation and mobility training. Only 4% have occupational or physical therapy.

Many smaller school districts would be severely affected if students currently at WSVH transferred back to their home districts. A number of administrators said they could never provide the same educational opportunities as WSVH.

"These districts could be financially devastated," Wood said. "Under the current revenue caps, there is no way they could absorb the costs of educating these students. They would have to cut existing programs and services."

Weeden added, "Most of the children now attending WSVH have multiple handicaps, not just vision problems. They require very specialized programming, teachers, and equipment in order to receive an adequate education. It is just not possible to replicate the educational opportunities now found at WSVH in hundreds of school districts across this state."

Wood and Weeden renewed their call for further study, such as an in-depth analysis by a Legislative Council study committee next spring.

"DPI acted without having all the facts," Wood said. "As we continue to look into this issue, it becomes even more clear what a valuable resource the state has in WSVH and what a mistake it would be to close the school."

Posted November 4, 1997

 

Education News