WEAC President Testifies
WEAC President Terry Craney testified April 15, 1999, before the Legislature's
Joint Finance Committee, which is reworking the governor's proposed
state budget for 1999-2001. In his presentation, Craney:
- Called for the expansion of the Student Achievement Guarantee in
Education (SAGE) class size reduction program.
- Urged the removal of proposals to allow school districts statewide
to contract out for education services.
- Called for repeal of school district revenue controls and the Qualified
Economic Offer law.
Craney was the last of several WEAC members who testified before the
committee as it considers the upcoming two-year state budget.
Following is the text of Craney's testimony:
* * *
Thank you Co-chairpersons Burke and Gard and members of the Joint Finance
Committee for holding this public hearing on the 1999-2001 biennial
budget bill. My name is Terry Craney, I am President of the Wisconsin
Education Association Council.
"The Hortonville strike
highlighted the unfairness
of the laws in the 1970s and
led to the Legislature
adopting a bargaining
system that worked well
until the QEO was imposed
in 1993. Now we need a
new legislative solution to
correct this unjust
situation of the 1990s." WEAC President
Terry Craney |
The biennial budget bill has grown in complexity and size over the
years. It contains many issues of interest to educators throughout the
state. I would like to provide some brief comments from the perspective
of educators in Wisconsin.
We are enthused by the governor's support for lowering class sizes.
The governor's proposed expansion of the Student
Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) class size reduction program
is a welcome addition to the budget. Research has established that lowering
class sizes improves student performance, especially among the most
needy students in low-income districts.
The SAGE program is a proven success. Now let's expand the program
to all eligible schools in the state and make sure as many children
as possible benefit from the program. We also encourage the Legislature
to keep the 50% low-income eligibility rate for SAGE schools.
In addition, we applaud the governor's continued commitment to investments
in educational telecommunications and technology through the TEACH program.
We are pleased to see that a solution has been offered to continue the
BadgerLink program. We also support funding levels in the budget for
standards and testing as requested by the DPI and favor the efforts
to get more teachers certified through the National Board for Professional
Teaching Standards.
There are, however, some other issues in the budget bill that cause
concern for educators in Wisconsin:
Removal of non-fiscal policy:
We would like to commend efforts made by the non-partisan Legislative
Fiscal Bureau to compile a list
of non-fiscal policy items in the budget. We would also like to
thank the co-chairs of the Joint Finance Committee for agreeing to remove
items that relate to bargaining over the creation of charter schools,
approving alternative waivers for teacher licenses, starting school
after September 1st and the closing of schools.
A few of the Fiscal Bureau items remain in the budget. We call upon
legislators to do the right thing and remove these items from the budget
so that they may receive a full and fair public review by the education
committees of the Legislature. Specifically, we request the following
items be removed from the budget bill. (Note the pages listed correspond
with the LFB summary of the governor's budget bill):
WEAC supports removal of these remaining non-fiscal policy items
in the budget bill:
- Charter
Schools -- Instrumentality of the School District (pp. 499, item
#8). This item repeals the requirement that for-profit charter school
established by the Common Council in Milwaukee be instrumentalities
of the school district. WEAC opposes this policy.
- Charter
Schools -- Petition Process Modifications (pp. 499, item #9).
This item allows those denied a petition to create a charter school
to appeal that decision to the Department of Public Instruction. WEAC
opposes this policy.
- School
District Referendum Scheduling (pp. 503, item #1). This item requires
school districts to limit referendum elections to spring and fall.
WEAC opposes this policy.
- School
Contracting Authority (pp. 505, item #3), (pp. 215, item #7 (in
part)). This item allows school boards to contract out for education
services and the impact of such a decision on wages, hours and conditions
of employment would be a prohibited subject of bargaining. WEAC opposes
this policy.
Relief from revenue caps:
While we applaud the governor for extending temporary relief from the
revenue
caps for declining enrollment school districts, we believe the time
has come for the Legislature to repeal state imposed revenue caps. Legislative
proposals are now pending before both houses of the Legislature to provide
much needed relief from revenue caps. Short of absolute repeal, WEAC
supports revenue cap relief measures dealing with issues such as school
security measures, debt service costs, special assessments, technology,
4-year-old kindergarten and summer school pupil counts, just to name
a few. These are all examples showing that revenue caps are not working
and are harming the quality of our public schools.
Funding special education:
The revenue caps force school districts to pit programs that support
the most needy students against other educational programs. Districts
are forced to make the choice between funding special needs children
or cutting back on other general education programs or extracurricular
activities. The governor's decision to freeze
special education aid and to repeal the state's commitment to fund 63%
of those costs will only make matters worse. WEAC calls upon the
Legislature to live up to its commitment to fund special education programs.
We also ask that you allow school districts to raise revenue outside
of the revenue caps to bridge the gaps caused by increasing costs in
special education.
WTCS funding:
WEAC believes that the Wisconsin Technical College system (WTCS) works
effectively to train Wisconsin's work force. WEAC also believes that
the Wisconsin Technical College system ensures that Wisconsin's businesses
have highly skilled workers. The Wisconsin Technical College system
has a long, although largely untold, history of being a strong, stable
system that helps maintain Wisconsin's strong and stable economy.
WEAC urges you to support the general
state aid increase requested by the WTCS agency, for a 4.4% and
a 4.8% increase. This request represents approximately a $5 million
and a $6 million increase in each year of the biennium, and reflects
what the technical colleges need to meet the requests for training and
re-training coming to them from Wisconsin businesses and workers. Under
current funding conditions, the WTCS is forced to meet its funding needs
by "taxing to the max." Many WTCS districts are close to reaching
the maximum 1.5 mill rate allowed by law. This will further erode the
state's commitment to property tax relief.
One thing is absolutely certain. WTCS graduates, over a short period
of time, return more state incomes tax dollars than the state invests
in the Wisconsin Technical College System. Funding the Wisconsin Technical
College System should not be considered an expense, but a wise investment
in the health of Wisconsin's present and future economy.
Children's health and safety -- Prevention of smoking by minors:
The governor's budget shows improved commitment for early
childhood excellence and Head Start programs. We also have a strong
belief that an unhealthy child is a poor learner. WEAC is a participant
in the Tobacco Free Coalition and the TRUST Campaign for the use of
the tobacco settlement funds. The TRUST group, headed by the efforts
of Senator Judy Robson and Representative Frank Urban, is calling for
$50 million of the settlement funds to be used for comprehensive prevention
and education programs.
Organizations participating in the TRUST campaign are working together
in support of funding for statewide, comprehensive programs and services
that will reduce the addiction, disease, disability, and premature death
caused by the use of tobacco. It is time to prevent children from beginning
a lifelong addiction to tobacco products.
Repeal of the Qualified Economic Offer Law:
Finally, let me end by appealing to the members of this committee,
the Legislature and the governor to bring an end to the unfairness of
the Qualified Economic
Offer Law.
Between 1966 and 1977, Wisconsin Education Association Council and
Wisconsin Federation of Teachers members went out on strike in 50 school
districts throughout the state. The most famous was the 1974
Hortonville strike, where 84 teachers lost their jobs.
Twenty-five years ago this spring the Hortonville School Board fired
almost all of the district's teachers after they went on strike because
the board refused to reach a fair settlement. Twenty-five years ago,
the schools in Hortonville reopened with replacement teachers. The strike
and its aftermath threw the lives of the "Hortonville 84"
into stress and turmoil.
The mass firings provided a dramatic example of how a flawed collective
bargaining law led to an abuse of power by an unreasonable school board.
The firings contributed to a political climate for change by showing
the people of Wisconsin how much disruption a bad law can cause. The
Hortonville experience so energized WEAC members that, over the next
two years, they mobilized to win a new, fair law through intensive political
action and lobbying efforts.
From 1978 to 1993, school employees and school boards in Wisconsin
peacefully settled labor contract disputes by referring impasses to
neutral third-party arbitrators.
Teachers' voices are once again ignored at the bargaining table. The
QEO law unfairly singles out teachers and destroys their collective
bargaining rights. When combined with the revenue caps, this law is
forcing school districts to make painful decisions to cut or reduce
programs that affect the quality of education in their schools. Employers
are hiding behind the law rather than bargaining.
These laws need to be repealed. The Hortonville strike highlighted
the unfairness of the laws in the 1970s and led to the Legislature adopting
a bargaining system that worked well until the QEO was imposed in 1993.
Now we need a new legislative solution to correct this unjust situation
of the 1990s.
Therefore, the Wisconsin Education Association Council supports full
repeal of the Qualified Economic Offer law.
The QEO is unfair
- The QEO singles out and penalizes one group of public employees,
a majority of whom are women.
- The QEO penalizes employees who are planning to retire by giving
them a life sentence of reduced pensions.
The QEO destroys collective bargaining
- Employers are allowed to unilaterally impose a QEO, forcing employees
to "take-it or leave-it." The employees' only recourse for
dispute resolution is to engage in job actions.
- The QEO blocks discussion of creative solutions to the challenges
facing public schools (such as proposals dealing with class size and
teacher preparation).
- The QEO discourages consensus bargaining.
QEO harms the quality of public education
- The QEO reduces collaboration between labor and management resulting
in increased tension in the workplace which interferes with educational
quality.
- The QEO discourages the best and the brightest from entering and
staying in the education profession.
- The QEO contributes to lower employee morale.
Thank you for this opportunity to speak to you today.
Posted April 16, 1999