skip to main navigation skip to demographic navigationskip to welcome messageskip to quicklinksskip to features
  • Membership Ad Test 3
  • WEAC Member Benefits

1997-1999 State Budget Brief

GOVERNOR'S BUDGET SUMMARY -- CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

Background - Governor's Address:

At 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday February 12, 1997, Governor Thompson officially presented his 1997-99 biennial budget to a joint session of the legislature. This memorandum is an initial summary of educational and other select provisions in the bill. Additional summaries of the budget bill along with talking points will be produced by the Government Relations Division as the budget is debated in the legislature.

Joint Finance Committee (JFC) Introduction of Identical Bills in Each House:

In what may be an unprecedented move in state budget history, the JFC voted to introduce identical bills in both the Assembly and the Senate. On a vote of 12-4 the Committee approved a motion to have both houses work on identical budget bills simultaneously. The two bills are Senate Bill 77 and Assembly Bill 100. In addition, there were no conclusions reached regarding votes and procedures for the committee. In the past, a single majority (9 votes) was required for the JFC to remove or add provisions to the budget.

At issue is which house will control the veto review session. The last budget (AB 150) was an Assembly bill which would require this budget to be a Senate bill. The house that introduces the bill is also the house that initiates debate during veto review. Senator Jauch said that he was disgusted with what he characterized as an insult to the Senate. Co-chairperson Jensen said that the idea was brought forth to allow for timely bi-partisan debate in both houses so that differences could be addressed by a conference committee.

(Return to Index)

JOINT FINANCE COMMITTEE TENTATIVE SCHEDULE FOR BUDGET REVIEW:

The JFC co-chairs released a memorandum that established the following schedule for budget review:

  • Week of March 10 -- Briefings by the Fiscal Bureau
  • Week of March 17 -- Briefings by the Fiscal Bureau and/or state agency heads
  • Week of March 24 -- Briefings by state agency heads
  • Weeks of April 7 and 14 -- Public hearings. Public hearings will be held in Eau Claire, Madison, Milwaukee and Wausau.
  • Public hearings: Two hearings will be held in Madison; one conducted solely via teleconference with sites in Green Bay and Superior. (The committee will not be in session on Mondays or Fridays.)
  • Detailed Schedule: Once the Fiscal Bureau summary is complete, the co-chairs will provide the JFC with a detailed schedule of the briefings and the times, dates and specific locations of the public hearings.

(Return to Index)

STANDARDS AND TESTING

BUDGET SECTIONS: 21/23/249/2805/2806/2807/2809/2810/2811/2871

Model Standards and Graduation Test:

  • Require the development of model academic standards in reading/writing, mathematics, science, history and geography by September 1997; and require all school districts to implement standards by the beginning of the 1998-99 school year.
  • Require DPI to develop a high school graduation test by June 30, 1999. Require school districts to administer the test, or their own tests, beginning in the 1999-2000 school year. Local school boards would be required to provide pupils with at least four opportunities to take the examination in the high school grades.
  • Create a Standards Development Council (SDC) to develop model standards in the five core subject areas of math, science, reading/writing, history and geography. The council is in the office of the governor where the chairperson shall be the lieutenant governor. Additional members of the council include a representative of the DPI, chairpersons of the education committees of the Assembly and Senate, the ranking minority member of each committee and one member appointed by the governor.
  • NOTE: The governor's proposal would allow districts to develop their own standards in lieu of the state model. This local option would also be available for the high school graduation test requirement.
  • NOTE: By the effective date of the budget, the governor will have established a set of model standards and deliver them to the standards development council. Although the council may modify the standards, the governor shall have final approval and issue the approved standards as an executive order.

(Return to Index)

EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING

BUDGET SECTIONS: 45/52/53/116/120/124/125/148/150/151/221/
235/264/270/272/283/667/674/680/681/736/737/
752/ 753/815/816 /818/820/824/826/834/ 916/
1168/1192/1212-1215/ 1342- 1344/1347/2877/
3145-3155/3158/9101/9140/9141/9401

Creation of a New Technology for Educational Achievement (TEACH) Wisconsin Board:

  • A newly created TEACH board responsible for working with public school districts, CESAs, the UW System Board of Regents, the WTCS Board and the DOA to do all of the following -- (1) promote the efficient, cost-effective procurement, installation and maintenance of educational technology by school districts, CESA's and by UW and WTCS institutions -- (2) identify best methods of providing in-service training for teachers and faculty relating to the effective use of educational technology and administer funding for teacher training and -- (3) establish standards and specifications for the purchase of education technology hardware and software and for the installation and upgrading of school and computer network wiring.
  • The TEACH Wisconsin Board would be a nine-member board including a member of the UW Board of Regents and a member of the WTCS Board appointed by their respective boards, the Secretary of DOA, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and five members appointed by the governor. The governor also appoints the executive director of the board.
  • The governor's budget calls for $30,096,500 in FY98 and $54,710,900 in FY99 (from various revenue sources - GPR/PR-O/SEG-O) and 6.00 full time equivalent (FTE) positions for the new agency.
  • NOTE: This provision coincides with the recommended elimination of the Pioneering Partners Grant and Loan Program and the Educational Technology Board. These programs' function and appropriations will be taken over by the new TEACH board. Their primary function is for awarding grants and loans to school district and public libraries for distance education and educational technology projects. In addition distance learning functions of the Educational Communications Board (ECB) would be transferred to the new Board.
  • NOTE: In his budget address, the Governor stated that all funds relating to education technology would be outside of the state's imposed revenue limits. This represents the first exemption in the limits supported by the Governor.

Educational Technology Block Grants - Administered by TEACH Agency:

  • Provide $25M GPR/SEG in FY98 and $40M GPR/SEG in FY99 for noncompetitive block grants to school districts for educational technology. The block grants would be proportional to the number of persons between the ages of 4 and 20 who reside in each school district. A base grant is also provided to all school districts in the amount of $5,000.
  • The block grants would be used to purchase and maintain computer hardware and software, to train professional staff members in using educational technology, and for the repayment of loans related to investments in educational technology.
  • NOTE: Additional grant awards to districts would depend in part on a weighted scale. The scale would be based on a school district's property values measured against the state average equalized valuation per pupil. In addition, all grants would be available only if the school board adopts a resolution requesting the grant.
  • NOTE: Grants to districts would be deposited in a separate fund. The funds may be used for any purpose related to educational technology, except that a school district may not use the funds to pay the salary or benefits of any school district employee.

Grants to CESAs - Administered by the TEACH Agency:

  • TEACH agency will promulgate rules to provide $4M annually to CESAs. The funds are designated for teacher training programs and to fund two staff members per CESA. One staff person would provide technical assistance related to educational technology and a second staff person will coordinate and provide educational training for the school districts served by the CESA agency.

Subsidized School Wiring Loans / Telecommunications Access - Administered by the TEACH Agency:

  • Provide $50M annually in state bonding authority for loans to school districts to upgrade their electrical and computer network wiring. Provide funding for the state to pay one- half of the principal and interest charges on the loans to school districts.
  • Direct the PSC to coordinate with the TEACH board and the DOA to use moneys in the universal service fund to ensure that all school districts are able to access a high speed data link providing direct Internet access and, if the district chooses, two-way video link for not more than $250/month.
  • The board determines the interest rate for loans which shall be "as low as possible" but shall be sufficient to fully pay all interest expenses incurred by the state.

(Return to Index)

SCHOOL TO WORK

BUDGET SECTIONS: 2688/2689/261/262/282/284/611-613/617/1177/1182/1184/1191/2666- 2675/2677/2680/2813-2815/2870/9140/9147/9347/9426

Consolidation of School-to-Work Programs:

  • Modify existing programs to allow eligible students to complete their high school education at Wisconsin's technical colleges.
  • Consolidate school-to-work programs in one agency by designating the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) as the lead agency for education and work programs.

Create a new Division of Connecting Education and Work:

  • Consolidate school-to-work staff from the DPI and WTCS into a new division of Connecting Education and Work in the DWD. The new department will be required to annually prepare and submit to the legislature and to the governor a report on the activities of the governor's Council on Workforce Excellence. The report shall include a report on the status of the school-to-work programs.
  • In providing a school-to-work program the DWD will also; (1) annually prepare a plan for the operation of school-to-work programs identifying priorities for the statewide school- to-work program; (2) annually notify school boards, technical college district boards, the DPI and other interested educational and employment agencies of the purposes for grants awarded for school-to work programs; (3) review recommendations of the governor's Council on Workforce Excellence, approve school-to-work programs and award grants to programs approved by the DWD; (4) after reviewing recommendations of the governor's Council on Workforce Excellence, approve statewide skill standards for school-to-work programs provided by school boards.
  • NOTE: There is also a provision in the governor's budget which would allow the DWD to approve an "innovative" school-to-work program provided by a nonprofit organization for children at risk in a county having a population of 500,000 or more for the purposes of assisting children at risk in acquiring employability skills and occupational-specific competencies before leaving high school. This is also required only after the DWD has reviewed recommendations from the governor's Council on Workforce Excellence.
  • NOTE: The new division shall plan, coordinate, administer and implement the department's programs, policies and funding relating to the department's employment and education programs. This includes the development of curricula for youth apprenticeship programs. It shall also preform other employment and education programs that the governor by executive order assigns the division.
  • The DWD is also authorized to allocate up to a total of $600,000 each year in grants to nonprofit corporations and public agencies for the provision of career counseling centers throughout the state.

Development of Technical Preparation Programs:

  • Each school board will be required to establish a technical preparation program. The program shall consist of a coherent sequence of courses, approved by the technical college system board. The program shall integrate applied academic and technical competency-based curricula and that aredesigned to provide high school juniors and seniors with both high school and technical college credit or with advanced standing in a postsecondary institution upon graduation from high school.
  • The state superintendent, the Department of Industry, Labor and Job Development and the WTCS system board shall provide technical assistance to school boards to develop technical preparation programs in each high school.

(Return to Index)

TECHNICAL COLLEGE ATTENDANCE INSTEAD OF HIGH SCHOOL

BUDGET SECTIONS: 1179/1180/1185/1190/2709/2788/2812/2816/2818/
2819/2820/2821/2822-2825/2844 2845/2872

Attending Technical College Instead of High School -- Acceptance Criteria:

  • A pupil may request, with the written approval of a parent or guardian, to attend a technical college for the purpose of taking one or more courses if the student meets the following criteria: (1) the pupil has completed the 10th grade; (2) the pupil is in good academic standing; (3) the pupil notifies the school board of his or her intent to attend a technical college under this new law at least 90 days before the start of the technical college semester; (4) the pupil is not at risk as defined in s.118.153(1)(a).
  • NOTE: The technical college district board is required to admit the pupil based on available space and if he or she meets the admission requirements of the program for which he or she has applied, except that the district board may reject an application from a pupil who has a record of disciplinary problems, as defined by the district board.

Technical Colleges and School Board Responsibilities:

  • The technical college shall ensure that the child's educational program meets the high school graduation requirements established by the school district. It is the school board's responsibility to notify the pupil if a course at the technical college does not meet high school graduation requirements.
  • The pupil is eligible to receive both high school and technical college credit for courses successfully completed at the technical college.
  • The school board is responsible for paying the technical college in two installments: half at the beginning of the semester and half at the end of the semester according to the following plan: (1) if the pupil is attending the technical college for fewer than 7 credits, an amount equal to the cost of tuition, courses fees and books at the technical college; (2) if the pupil is attending the technical for 7 credits or more, an amount equal to the school district's average per pupil cost for regular instruction and instructional support services in the previous school year according to the established state aid formula.
  • The school board is not responsible for transporting a pupil attending a technical college under this new program. All transportation is the responsibility of the pupil and the parent or guardian.
  • An annual report is also required to be filed with the DOA, the DPI and the Department of Industry, Labor and Jobs. The report will include the following information: (1) the number of pupils in the program; (2) the type and number of credits earned by the pupils; (3) the number of persons who applied for admission to a technical college who had attended in the previous year; (4) a list of the courses given in high schools for which a pupil may receive postsecondary credit and the number of pupils enrolled in the courses for postsecondary credit in the previous school year and; (5) any other information considered relevant.

(Return to Index)

STATEWIDE PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAM

BUDGET SECTIONS: 255/1277/2759-2763/2765/2767/2781/2783-2785 / 2817 / 2826/ 2827/ 2843/ 2848/ 2856/2883/2885-2887/2889/2890-2893/9440

Creation of a Public School Choice Program:

  • Establish a statewide public school choice program beginning in FY 99. The proposal implements a statewide program on a space available basis.
  • School boards would be required to adopt criteria for acting on applications on a first come first served basis or on a random selection if applicants exceed space availability. The number of children transferring would be limited to 3% of enrollment in FY 99, and would increase by 1% each year thereafter until it reaches 10% in FY 2006.
  • Tuition would be paid by the district of residence to the district of attendance based on the lower of either district's costs, unless a different amount is negotiated. Transportation would be the responsibility of the parents', however, school districts would be authorized to provide transportation if they wish.
  • NOTE: These provisions are similar to the public school choice bill that failed last session.
  • NOTE: The Governor's budget contains this provision even though there is a Legislative Council study committee currently researching this issue. The study committee has not yet reached consensus on a number of issues relating to establishing a public school choice program in Wisconsin.

(Return to Index)

SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE LIMITS

BUDGET SECTION: 2896

PER-PUPIL INCREASE AND REVENUE CEILING:

  • Continue to freeze the amount of spending that school districts be allowed to increase per pupil under the revenue limits. School districts will only be allowed to increase their per- pupil spending by $206 per year.
  • Change the revenue ceiling from $5300 to $5,800 in the 1997-98 school year and from $5,600 to $6,000 in the 1998-99 school year, and allow poorer districts with per-pupil revenue below those amounts to increase their revenue up to the new ceiling without going to referendum.

(Return to Index)

CHARTER SCHOOLS

BUDGET SECTIONS: 258/2695/2808/2830-2842/2868/2869/2900/2901/9340/9440

Modification of Wisconsin's Charter School Program:

  • Modify the charter school program to repeal the five-year limit on charter school contracts for all charter schools and for students in Milwaukee; authorize the UW Milwaukee, MATC and the city of Milwaukee to grant charters.
  • NOTE: This provision requires that the MPS shared cost per pupil be withheld from MPS equalization aid and that it be paid to charter schools either established by, or contracted with, the newly established alternative sponsors.
  • In addition, petitioners who seek a charter and are denied a contract may appeal the decision to the Department of Public Instruction.
  • Repeal the requirement that petitioners must obtain the signatures of 10% of the teachers employed by the school district or by at least 50% of the teachers employed at one school of the district if the proposed charter school is not converted from an existing school.
  • Note: It appears that the appeal process after denial and the repeal of an establishment vote threshold criteria for charter schools would apply to all charter schools statewide.

(Return to Index)

MILWAUKEE PRIVATE/PAROCHIAL SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM

BUDGET SECTIONS: 2897/2898/2899

Change in Revenue Limit Calculation for Voucher Schools:

  • The governor's budget recommends that the Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) revenue limit should exclude pupils enrolled in the Milwaukee School Voucher Program from the three previous years (not including the current year).

(Return to Index)

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

Budget Reorganization - Transfer of Positions from DPI to Other Agencies:

  • Transfer all school-to-work employees from DPI to DWD -- $879,300 PR and 13 positions in FY98 and FY99.
  • Transfer all prevention programs currently administered by the DPI to the Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS) -- (1) transfer 5.0 FTE and $723,500 PR in FY98 and $759,600 PR in FY99 that administer AODA programs -- (2) transfer $1M GPR in each year for the Family and Schools Together (FAST) program -- (3) transfer $425,000 GPR in each year for the After School and Summer School Grant Programs -- (4) transfer $300,000 GPR in each year for the Student AODA Mini-Grants Program -- (5) transfer $1.8M GPR in each year for the Youth AODA program -- (6) transfer $1,900,300 PR in FY98 and $1,248,500 PR in FY99 for the Aid for AODA Program.
  • NOTE: The governor's budget recommends, however, that the five transferred categorical aid programs continue to be considered part of the state's commitment to fund two-thirds of school costs even though the programs would no longer be administered by the state's educational system at DPI.

Budget Efficiency Measures - Department of Public Instruction: $491,600/yr:

  • Reduce supplies and services funding by two percent in FY98 and two percent in FY99 throughout the agency for a total of 102,000 GPR in each year of the biennium.
  • Require DPI to recommend to the governor and the Joint Finance Committee by October 1, 1997 additional budget efficiency measures in the amounts of $389,600 in FY98 and $389,600 in FY99. The funds will be taken out of the DPI operations appropriations and will later be allocated to the proper appropriations upon approval of the agency's plan by the governor and the Joint Finance Committee.

Wisconsin State Schools for the Deaf and Visually Handicapped:

  • Appropriate funds for facility maintenance.
  • NOTE: The funds would be released by the DOA Secretary only upon approval of a plan indicating how the funds will be allocated. The funding appropriated for the school for the Deaf is approximately 12% of what was in the original agency request, and the school for the visually handicapped appropriation is approximately 5% of the original agency request.

(Return to Index)

SCHOOL AIDS AND SCHOOL LEVY PROPERTY TAX CREDIT

School Aids:

  • Retreat from a sum-sufficient appropriation back to a sum-certain appropriation to cover the state's commitment to fund 2/3 of school operation costs.
  • NOTE: The significance of the change to a sum-certain appropriation is that this mechanism is less flexible in meeting actual program costs if revenue estimates fall short of expected levels. Under a sum-sufficient the DPI, DOA and the Fiscal Bureau estimate the costs for meeting the two-thirds calculation every year. The budget proposal gives the governor's office authority to determine the amount necessary for every two year cycle. If their estimates fall short. This mechanism could cause the state to fail to meet the two- thirds mark every other year.
  • Increase direct school aids (general and categorical) by $204.3M in FY98 (for school year 1997-98) and by an additional $94.2M in FY 99 (for school year 1998-99).
  • Increase the school levy property tax credit applied against the 1998-99 school levy by $100M in FY2000 to met the two-thirds state funding of local school costs.
  • NOTE: This represents a continuation of a "mortgaging off" of funding the two-thirds commitment to another biennium. The 1995-97 budget contained a similar provision of $150M.

(Return to Index)

SELECTED DOA INITIATIVES

Private contracting/Transfers

  • Provide one-time funding to contract with a private auditing firm to conduct financial audits of state agencies. NOTE: This is apparently done to alleviate a backlog of agency audit transactions.
  • Transfer computer programmers from the Department of Health and Family Services to DOA for Internet support and development for state agencies.

(Return to Index)

SCHEDULING SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDA

  • Require school districts to schedule referendum questions in conjunction with April elections.
  • NOTE: This provision may severely limit school districts that need to respond to emergency situations or need adjustments to district funding beyond the revenue limits.

(Return to Index)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS FACILITY

Racine Facility:

  • Build a Racine Youthful Offender Correctional Facility. Funding for operation of a 500- bed facility scheduled to open in January, 1998. The appropriation requests $8,121,900 and 220 positions in FY98 and $10,938,300 in FY99.
  • NOTE: The staffing recommendations reflect the educational programming needed for young offenders who may still be required by state law to attend school. This also creates a staffing pattern that uses generalist counselors that reduces the certified teaching staff. Among other duties, the generalist counselors would facilitate academic instruction.
  • NOTE: The appropriation and staffing approved for the new facility is $3.1M less for FY 98 and $2.4M less in FY99 than what the agency requested. The Governor's recommendation is also 50 positions less than requested.

(Return to Index)

WISCONSIN STATE ELECTIONS BOARD -- FILING FEES

  • Create a $100 annual filing fee on each political action committee, political party committee, conduit, corporation and registrant that files an oath of independent expenditures if biennial activity exceeds $2,500.
  • NOTE: Even though revenue is generated by this item, it would not be used for the Elections Board. The budget would reduce base level GPR for the board by the amount of projected revenues from the new fee.

(Return to Index)

DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYE TRUST FUNDS -- POSITION ALLOCATIONS

Court Case Provisions:

  • In response to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals' Benson v. Gates decision, the governor recommends funding for 3.0 FTE project positions to process creditable service adjustments as required by the case decision.

(Return to Index)

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SUPPORT AGENCIES

Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission/Department of Employment Relations:

  • WERC: In addition to agency funding decreases, eliminate 3.0 FTE attorney positions on the commission and associated funding from the agency's base.
  • DER: In addition to agency funding decreases, eliminate one Management Information Manager number three position and one Equal Opportunity Specialist number seven position from the Department of Employee Relations staff.

(Return to Index)

GOVERNOR'S OFFICE

GPR Allocation for National Governors Conference:

  • The governor has provided his own office a one-time appropriation of $200,000 in FY98 for programmatic support for the National Governors Association meeting in Milwaukee, August 1-4, 1998.
  • NOTE: The governor did, however, impose an across-the-board-cut of two percent in his operating budget which is what he imposes on all other state agencies and the legislature. For his office this amount is $51,400 in each year of the biennium.

(Return to Index)

REVENUE ENHANCEMENT DEVICES

Department of Revenue -- Select Revenue Enhancement Devices:

  • Increase the cigarette tax by 5 cents per pack -- increase GPR by $20.4M in FY98 and by $21.5M in FY99.
  • Eliminate the sales and use tax exemptions for coin-operated laundry services -- increase GPR by $2.3M in FY98 and by $2.8M in FY99.
  • Impose a sales and use tax on telecommunications services that terminate in WI and are billed to a service address in this state -- increase GPR by $3.3M in FY98 and by $4.2M in FY99.
  • Impose a sales and use tax on all telephone answering and voice messaging services -- increase GPR by $0.8M in FY98 and by $1.1M in FY99.
  • Revise the individual income tax computation for part-year non-residents to apply a proration factor to the net tax liability on federally adjusted gross income, effective January 1, 1998 -- increase GPR by $4M annually beginning in FY99.
  • Prohibit state agencies from issuing or renewing a professional or occupational license if the Department of Revenue certifies that the license applicant owes delinquent taxes to the state -- increase tax collections by an estimated $800,000 in FY99.
  • NOTE: This provision would most likely include teachers and other licensed personnel in public schools.
  • NOTE: This list does not contain hunting or fishing license fee increases or other fee increases of that nature.

(Return to Index)

PROPERTY TAX RELIEF

Shared Revenue and Property Tax Relief:

  • Transfer the balance of the property tax relief fund (about $258M) to the general fund to support a portion of the FY98 increase in the state's property tax relief efforts. The DOA will be given the authority to annually transfer from the property tax relief fund to the general fund an amount equal to the increase in school aids and the school levy credit for the fiscal year compared to the previous fiscal year.
  • Increase the school levy credit by $150M beginning in 1997 (FY98) as the final component in achieving the goal of two-thirds state funding of local school costs. The governor also recommends a further $100M increase in the school levy credit beginning in 1999.
  • Establish a new lottery credit that will be paid to all property taxpayers. Each municipality will receive a share of lottery proceeds based on the municipality's portion of all property taxes levied in the state. Each taxpayer will then receive a credit on the tax bill based on his or her share of total property value in the municipality. The average homeowner will receive approximately a $100 credit in the first year and $50 each year thereafter.

(Return to Index)

UW SYSTEM AND TECHNOLOGY

  • Increase tuition expenditure authority by $500,000 in FY98 and $1M in FY99 to fund computer and software upgrades, e-mail and Internet access and other technologies for UW campuses. In addition, transfer all distance education functions from the UW System to the new Technology for Educational Achievement in Wisconsin Board.

(Return to Index)

STATE INVESTMENT BOARD

  • Provide funding for an operational information technology system. Add three permanent and two project positions for the implementation and operation of the board's investment management system.

(Return to Index)


Additional Initiatives Referenced in Budget Index Under Investigation as of 2/17/97

NOTE: Excerpt from the Legislative Reference Bureau Index to the Budget Bill: The governor's executive budget bill (the budget bill) is composed of individual bill drafts (component drafts), each dealing with a particular topic or program. The LRB has developed a guide that is available to locate bill sections in the budget that originated from a particular component draft. Listed below are some of the component topics that are of interest and will receive additional analysis.

Component Subject

Component Topic

Budget Sections:

Education Miscellaneous

Confidential information child support

2718/2719/2793/2794/2858/2 859

Education Miscellaneous

License suspension for failure to pay child support

2721/2792/9340/9440

Children-out-of-home- support

Suspension of licenses for failure to pay support (DPI)

2721/2792/9340/9440

Dom Rel - child support

Confidential information and child support (education)

2718/2719/2793/2794/2858/2 859

Health-Public Health

Eliminate state supplement for immunization

538/3401

Public Assistance-W2

Learnfare under W2

1887/1888

Public Assistance-W2

W2 child care expansion to 200% of poverty

1777/1849/1850/1851/1852

(Return to Index)

Memorandum Summary:

The actual budget bill is available via the Internet on the State of Wisconsin home page at http://www.state.wi.us by clicking on "The Wisconsin Legislature" and "Bill Tracking." Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 is required to view the budget on the Internet. If your computer does not have this program, it can be downloaded for free by following the instructions on the budget's website.

As mentioned in the introduction to the memorandum, this represents an initial summary of provisions contained in the biennial budget bill. Additional summaries of the budget bill, Joint Finance Committee, Senate and Assembly action will be produced by the Government Relations Division. If you have any reactions, comments or questions, please feel free to contact either John Stocks or Bob Burke in the WEAC Government Relations Division at 800-362-8034 ext. 209.

NOTE: Governor Thompson's proposed budget bill is more than 2,000 pages in length. If each of the component Legislative Reference Bureau draft numbers presented in the bureau's index represent a separate, stand-alone, piece of legislation, the governor's budget could be divided into 615 separate bills.

(Return to Index)

Posted March 23, 1997