THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Today's News
Friday, October 30, 1998
Part-Time Professors in Washington State
Assert Right to Pension Benefits
By DENISE K. MAGNER
Two adjunct faculty members at community colleges in Washington
State filed a claim for damages on Wednesday, alleging that they
and other part-time instructors had illegally been denied
retirement benefits.
Eva Mader and Dana Rush have both been long-time instructors in
the state's community colleges. According to their complaint,
state law says that employees who teach more than 50 per cent of a
full-time load are entitled to retirement benefits. However, the
claim says that the State Board for Community and Technical
Colleges has wrongly interpreted the law, maintaining that
part-timers had to teach more than 80 per cent of a full-time load
for two consecutive quarters to be eligible for retirement
benefits.
"We've come up with what we think is a blatant violation of
the regulations and statutes governing retirement benefits for
community-college faculty," said Stephen K. Strong, a lawyer
for the plaintiffs. He said the case could affect hundreds of
instructors throughout the state and amount to millions of dollars
in damages.
The claim was filed with Washington's risk-management division,
the first step that plaintiffs must take before suing the state.
If the state fails to respond within 60 days, the plaintiffs plan
to file a class action.
Ms. Mader teaches German at North Seattle Community College, and
Mr. Rush teaches astronomy at Green River Community College. The
instructors are seeking compensation, retroactively, for the
denial of retirement benefits.
"Eva has been working two-thirds of a full-time load for
over 20 years," Mr. Strong said. "If she had been
enrolled all along in the retirement plan, it would have involved
both employee and employer contributions. We're saying the state
is responsible for the entire amount of the loss. It's too late to
ask her to pay her share when she could have paid it all along."
The case comes on the heels of a separate class action filed
against Washington's community colleges by another group of
part-time instructors, who are seeking damages for what they say
are years of unpaid wages and overtime.
Officials of the state board, which oversees Washington's 32
two-year colleges, could not be reached for comment. John
Boesenberg, director of human resources for the state board, told
the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that the board had already
planned to ask the Legislature for $1.9-million to extend
retirement benefits to instructors who worked at least 50 per cent
of a full-time load.
The board interprets the state law governing those benefits
differently from the plaintiffs. The board maintains that an
instructor must spend at least 70 hours a month teaching in the
classroom to meet the standard of working 50 per cent of a
full-time load, and be eligible for retirement benefits. The
plaintiffs maintain that the board has misinterpreted the law, and
that the 70 hours need not be in the classroom, but can also
include hours spent preparing for class and grading papers.
Copyright © 1998 by The Chronicle of Higher
Education. Posted with permission on www.WEAC.org. This
article may not be posted, published, or distributed without
permission from The Chronicle. |