THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
THE FACULTY
July 31, 1998
FOOTNOTES
U. of Mass. Union Agrees to Tie Higher Pay
to Post-Tenure Reviews
Post-tenure review is still open for debate at the University
of Massachusetts, but its link to faculty salaries is a done
deal.
The faculty union, an affiliate of the Massachusetts Teachers
Association, last week ratified a three-year contract that calls
for continued bargaining in February over whether, and how, to
implement post-tenure reviews on the Amherst and Boston campuses.
But the new contract already stipulates that bigger raises are
contingent upon the union's agreeing to institute the reviews: If
the faculty union agrees, professors would receive a salary
increase of 15 per cent over the next three years. They get only
half that much if the union rejects post-tenure reviews.
John Kingston, an associate professor of linguistics and a
member of the bargaining team for the union, described the
administration's tactic as a "carrot."
While "there is great unease among a large segment of the
faculty about post-tenure reviews," he said, many professors
were not afraid of such reviews and wanted the bigger raises.
The union won improvements for some part-timers. The new
contract requires the university to provide health and retirement
benefits to part-timers who teach at least two courses each
semester and who have belonged to the union for at least a year.
That provision affects about 75 people -- a little more than half
of the part-timers, most of whom work on the Boston campus.
The contract also requires both sides to study the use of
non-tenure-track faculty members.
Copyright © 1998 by The Chronicle of Higher
Education. Posted with permission on www.WEAC.org. This
article may not be posted, published, or distributed without
permission from The Chronicle. |