| SEARCH OnWEAC |
|---|
| 163KB PDF |
Questionaire Results
Directions: Listed below are some actions that school districts have taken to comply with the state revenue caps during the past school year. For each, circle one of the choices available. If your district took no action in 2001-2002, circle “No Action.” If your district took action, circle the number which best describes the effects: (1) “Very Negative,” (2) “Negative,” (3) “No Difference,” (4) “Positive,” or (5) “Very Positive.” If you don’t know the effects, circle (6) for “Don’t Know.” Please answer all questions on this survey.
| Program or service area | % taking action |
Very neg |
Neg |
No diff |
Pos |
Very pos |
DK |
| 1. Delayed building maintenance or improvement projects | 78% |
20% |
67% |
12% |
-% |
1% |
1% |
| 2. Spent less for maintenance of buildings and grounds | 83 |
19 |
68 |
11 |
- |
1 |
1 |
| 3. Spent less for improvements of buildings and grounds | 84 |
22 |
64 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 4. Delayed/reduced purchase of curricular materials | 77 |
22 |
64 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 5. Reduced purchase of consumable supplies, such as paper | 75 |
12 |
46 |
41 |
- |
1 |
- |
| 6. Delayed/reduced purchase of computers, other technology | 80 |
32 |
48 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
- |
| 7. Offered fewer staff development opportunities for teachers | 74 |
24 |
45 |
30 |
- |
- |
- |
| 8. Laid off teachers | 69 |
45 |
28 |
25 |
- |
1 |
- |
| 9. Laid off teacher aides or other support staff | 71 |
36 |
43 |
20 |
- |
1 |
1 |
| 10. Laid off administrators/ supervisors | 56 |
23 |
32 |
43 |
1 |
- |
2 |
| 11. Reduced counseling or similar services | 53 |
20 |
24 |
54 |
- |
1 |
1 |
| 12. Delayed hiring of new staff | 65 |
21 |
49 |
29 |
- |
- |
- |
| 13. Reduced extracurricular programs | 55 |
16 |
31 |
52 |
- |
- |
1 |
| 14. Reduced programs for students who are at risk | 51 |
13 |
31 |
55 |
- |
- |
1 |
| 15. Reduced programs for gifted and talented students | 60 |
23 |
38 |
38 |
1 |
- |
1 |
| 16. Offered fewer courses | 57 |
18 |
37 |
43 |
1 |
- |
1 |
| 17. Reduced transportation services for students | 56 |
10 |
26 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
| 18. Reduced summer school programs | 49 |
7 |
23 |
66 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| 19. Offered fewer field trips for students | 61 |
13 |
45 |
39 |
1 |
- |
2 |
| 20. Increased class sizes | 68 |
27 |
48 |
23 |
1 |
- |
- |
| 21. Increased teacher workload | 70 |
20 |
51 |
28 |
- |
- |
- |
| 22. Increased administrator workload | 78 |
30 |
52 |
18 |
- |
- |
- |
| 23. Increased student fees | 75 |
25 |
39 |
32 |
4 |
1 |
- |
| 24. Used fund balance to support budget | 69 |
31 |
40 |
27 |
- |
1 |
- |
| 25. Reduced number of academic courses offered to students | 52 |
12 |
34 |
51 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| 26. Reduced courses in art, music, theater, vocational, etc. | 54 |
15 |
32 |
51 |
- |
1 |
1 |
| 27. Did not replace departing staff | 79 |
26 |
44 |
27 |
1 |
2 |
- |
28. Does your district's census predict decreasing, increasing, or about the same enrollment over the next 4-5 years?
29. What has been the effect of the revenue controls on your district's capacity to hire and retain top quality administrators, education support staff, teachers, and guidance counselors/social workers/psychologists? Write the appropriate number in the blank spaces. Use choices below:
1 = Very negative 2 = Negative 3 = No difference 4 = Positive 5 = Very positive
| Negative |
No difference |
Positive |
|
| Hiring administrators | 7% |
62% |
1% |
| Hiring education support staff | 30% |
70% |
1% |
| Hiring teachers | 51% |
48% |
1% |
| Hiring guidance counselors/social workers/ pyschologists | 35% |
64% |
1% |
| Retaining administrators | 38% |
61% |
1% |
| Retaining education support staff | 32% |
67% |
2% |
| Retaining teachers | 46% |
52% |
2% |
| Retaining guidance counselors/social workers/pyschologists | 33% |
65% |
2% |
30. How adequate are your district's funds for meeting the following needs?
Meeting all the requirements of the 2001 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, including testing.
Training/preparing staff for implementation of PI 34, including mentoring, released time, and training of professional development teams, etc.
Implementing effective use of technology.
Meeting the needs of both regular and special education students.
31. The Governor has appointed a Task Force on Educational Excellence that is charged with examining Wisconsin’s system of financing education by investigating several factors, including, but not limited to: attracting and retaining quality staff, supporting special education, investing in early education, providing the appropriate level of funding and the right mix of funding sources, and ensuring equal opportunity for all children.
If you could make one or two recommendations to the members of this task force, what would be they be? (Note: all responses will be anonymous) Read written comments
32. What have been the long-term effects of the revenue caps on your district’s programs and services?
33. What is the name of your district? (For accounting purposes only. No information specific to any district will be reported)
District name = ____________________________