Effects of the Revenue Caps
on Wisconsin's
School Districts,
1996-97 School Year

Cost-Cutting Actions Since 1993-94

Table 2 shows the percent of districts which report making cuts on at least one occasion since 1993-94. For example, more than two-thirds of districts report delaying/reducing purchase of computers or other technology in one or more school years since 1993-94.

Table2
Percent of Districts Reporting Cost-Saving Actions During at least one School Year Since 1993-94

Action Taken

Since 1993-94

1.Delaying building maintenance or improvement projects

61.2

2.Spending less for maintenance of buildings and grounds

55.7

3.Spending less for improvements of buildings and grounds

60.6

4.Delaying/reducing purchase of textbooks, curricular materials

41.7

5.Limiting purchase of consumable supplies, such as paper

35.5

6.Delaying/reducing purchase of computers, other technology

68.6

7.Offering fewer staff development opportunities for teachers

35.5

8. Teacher layoffs

18.6

9. Layoffs of teacher aides or other support staff

23.5

10. Administrator/supervisor layoffs

14.0

11. Reducing counseling or similar services

10.1

12. Delaying/reducing hiring of new staff

48.9

13. Reducing extracurricular programs

14.0

14. Limiting programs for students who are at risk

22.5

15. Limiting programs for gifted and talented students

31.9

16. Offering fewer courses

16.6

17. Reducing transportation services for students

14.3

18. Limiting summer school programs

31.3

19. Offering fewer field trips for students

25.7

20. Increased class sizes

35.2

21. Increased teacher workload

30.0

22. Increased administrator workload

52.4

23. Increased student fees

40.1

24. Using fund balance to support budget

39.1

25. Other

5.5

In addition to delaying/reducing computers or technology, one-third or more of the districts report taking the following actions to meet the revenue limits:

  • delaying building maintenance or improvement projects (61.2%)
  • spending less for improvements of building and grounds (60.6%)
  • spending less for maintenance of buildings and grounds (55.7%)
  • increased administrator workload (52.4%)
  • delaying/reducing hiring of new staff (48.9%)
  • delaying/reducing purchase of textbooks or curricular materials (41.7%)
  • increased student fees (40.1%)
  • using the fund balance to support the budget (39.1%)
  • offering fewer staff development opportunities for teachers (35.5%)
  • limiting purchase of consumable supplies, such as paper (35.5%)
  • increased class sizes (35.2%)

Return to Index

Posted February 4, 1998