NEA President Bob Chase Says Vouchers are Divisive
The
U.S. Supreme Court Thursday (June 27, 2002) upheld the Cleveland private
school voucher program. Following is a statement by National Education Association
President Bob Chase. The National Education Association pledges to continue to fight for
children and public education - and oppose divisive and counterproductive
proposals to divert energy, attention, and resources to private school
tuition vouchers, despite the US Supreme Court's ruling in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris,
the Cleveland private school voucher case. Just because vouchers may be
legal in some circumstances doesn't make them a good idea.
The record is clear that American public schools have improved dramatically
- and are continuing to change. Reading and math scores on the National
Assessment of Education Progress have increased steadily since 1992, the
proportion of high school graduates with a bachelor's degree has grown,
and more students are taking advanced math and science and other core
academic courses.
Vouchers are a divisive and expensive diversion from continuing progress
in these areas.
Make no mistake, vouchers are not reform. If policymakers want to act
on the issues that parents care most about - the kitchen table discussions
about education opportunity for their children - they will address teacher
quality, class size, making sure all schools have high expectations for
every child, and providing the resources to help students succeed.
When voters have had an opportunity to choose, they have defeated vouchers
by two to one margins. At least 26 state legislatures have rejected voucher
proposals - some of them several times. Last year, at least eight states
rejected legislative proposals for vouchers, and several more rejected
voucher-like tuition tax credits or tax credits or deductions for scholarships.
Moreover, a 1992 Congressional Research Service report found that aid
to sectarian schools is, at a minimum, uncertain in all but 12 states
and explicitly prohibited in at least six states.
We will continue to fight for public schools and against vouchers - or
related schemes to provide public funds to private and religious schools
- at the ballot box, in state legislatures, and in state courts.
We will continue this fight in allegiance with the vast majority of American
parents who want good schools in their communities. And we will continue
this fight with the best interests of children foremost in our minds.
Johnson says ruling is 'a costly mistake'
Resource page on private school vouchers
Posted June 27, 2002