WPRI Report is 'Illogical,' Craney Says
A conservative organization's conclusion that the way
public school teachers select health insurance carriers needs to be changed
is "flawed and illogical," according to WEAC.
A Wisconsin Policy Research Institute paper claims the
WEA Insurance Trust has an unfair market share and state taxpayers could
save money by making changes.
"The WEA Trust is an extremely efficient
and competitive company that provides outstanding insurance programs
to educators." ------------
Terry Craney |
"Instead of demonstrating why the system needs to be
changed, the report in fact demonstrates why teachers are well served
by the Trust," WEAC President Terry Craney said. "The WEA Trust is an
extremely efficient and competitive company that provides outstanding
insurance programs to educators. Our members need and deserve good medical
insurance, given the fact they work directly with large numbers of children
and are exposed to many health risks."
WPRI is claiming that because school districts and teacher
unions negotiate health insurance, the WEA Trust has an unfair advantage
and stifles competition.
"In fact, it has an advantage but its advantage is
based on its efficiency and high customer satisfaction," Craney said.
"The Trust is one of our nation's most efficient insurance companies.
This efficiency has allowed the company to develop nationally recognized
prevention programs that keep our members healthy and reduce costs."
Craney said a WPRI suggestion that taxpayers could save
millions of dollars if teachers used the state employee insurance plan
is "groundless."
Craney said research shows WEAC members pay little more
for their current plans, which allow them to choose their health care
providers, than state employees pay for their more restrictive HMO plans.
He added that it is ironic that much of the WPRI report is based on insurance
costs for the Milwaukee, Madison, Racine and Green Bay school districts,
none of which are covered by WEA.
"Much of the WPRI criticism of WEA is that it produces
larger surpluses than other companies," Craney said. "What WPRI does not
say is that the Trust is a non-profit entity. Its charter prevents it
from making a profit. Any surplus must be returned to members through
reduced premiums or improved coverage. WPRI also does not reveal that
WEA uses more conservative accounting principles than many big insurance
companies because it tries to guard against sudden premium increases that
would harm school district budgets as well as employees."
Craney said the WPRI report is an attack on collective
bargaining.
"We believe school districts and their employees are
much better suited to determine the cost-effectiveness of insurance plans
than a conservative group whose agenda is largely driven by corporate
donors," he said. "Calls for 'reform' make no sense. The current system
works well by providing high quality insurance coverage to school employees.
Teacher compensation is composed of salary and benefits. One of the reasons
the Trust was created 30 years ago was to provide high-quality health
care at a reasonable price. That goal has been accomplished."
Craney added that in the current era of competing market
forces, good health coverage is one of the few benefits that keeps teachers
in the classroom instead of leaving for higher paying jobs elsewhere.
"And it seems very ironic that a conservative organization
is calling for a government take-over of a system that is now under local
control," he said.
WPRI was established in 1987 with a grant from the Lynde
and Harry Bradley Foundation.
The Institute conducts research on public policy in
Wisconsin with an emphasis on free markets and private enterprise.
It consistently issues "reports" attacking public education,
teachers and organizations like WEAC.
WPRI depends on the Bradley Foundation for about two-thirds
of its revenues.
In 1995, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation gave
WPRI $460,000, along with $17,500 from the John M. Olin Foundation and
$1,000 from the Roe Foundation.
The Bradley Foundation is an outspoken critic of public
education and an advocate for private school vouchers and the privatization
of public education.
Posted December 19, 2000