Sen. Ellis Unveils Plan to Overhaul School Finance
Sen. Michael Ellis this week (December 1, 1999) unveiled a comprehensive
proposal to overhaul Wisconsin's school finance system with the goal
of restoring equity in education.
The plan would create a single statewide school property tax rate and
implement a basic state grant program that accounts for the higher costs
of educating special-needs students.
"This plan effectively restructures education financing for the new
millennium to ensure adequacy, equity and equal opportunity for all
children in Wisconsin," Ellis said in a summary distributed throughout
the Capitol.
The plan, which Ellis describes as "a starting point for an honest
dialogue," taps the same amount of money currently distributed to school
districts, but uses an entirely new system for determining how it is
distributed. It throws out the current system of school levy credits
and eliminates many categorical aids.
The Ellis plan has two key elements. First, every student would receive
a basic grant of $7,600. Additional funds would be provided to children
with special educational needs, children with limited English proficiency,
and children eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. Revenue limits,
currently calculated for 426 separate school districts, would be replaced
by a single revenue limit in the calculation of the basic grant. Two-thirds
of total funding of these grants would be provided through state general
purpose revenues derived from income and sales taxes.
The other one-third of the funding would come from the second key element
of the plan a state-levied property tax with a uniform mil rate.
That rate would equal an estimated $8.58 per $1,000, compared to the
current average rate of $11.30. Every homeowner throughout the state
would pay the same rate for school purposes.
A local district would be free to raise and spend additional money
but such additional spending would have to be authorized by referendum
if 10% of district voters request a referendum.
Ellis said the current system of school finance which is being
challenged in a lawsuit now before the State Supreme Court has
become increasingly inequitable since it was last reformed in 1973-74.
As a result, he said, Wisconsin now has a system in which "property-wealthy
districts can tax low and spend high but property-poor districts ...
must tax high just to spend low."
Ellis used the examples of the property-rich Gibraltar district in
Door County and the property-poor Bowler district in central Wisconsin.
In 1997-98, Gibraltar had a per-pupil value of $1.7 million, received
$225 per pupil in general state aid and $464 in categorical aids, taxed
at a rate of $4.15 to raise an additional $8,460 and spent $9,140 per
pupil.
Bowler had a per-pupil property value of $88,193, received $4,867 per
pupil in general aid and $321 in categorical aids, but still had to
tax at a rate of $8.63 to raise an additional $690 per pupil.
"Bowler received more than seven times the amount of state aid per
pupil as Gibraltar, yet it had to tax at a rate twice as high to achieve
overall spending at 70% of Gibraltar's expenditures," Ellis said. "Simply
by living in Bowler, Wisconsin, rather than Gibraltar, Wisconsin, a
taxpayer must pay taxes at more than twice the rate in order to provide
a child in the district with less. Clearly, wealth neutrality is not
a component of Wisconsin's school finance system."
Ellis delivered his plan to the Association for Equity in Funding,
which represents more than 150 school districts in its lawsuit challenging
the current system of school finance. WEAC is an intervenor in the lawsuit.
Also at the Capitol, Sen. Brian Burke and Rep. Joe Plouff announced
they were introducing legislation they said would address the inequities
in the current system.
Plouff and Burke said they were introducing the bill on behalf of the
Association for Equity in Funding. They said their proposal would create
a guaranteed tax base for every pupil, resulting in an equal tax effort
to fund expenditures per pupil.
Posted December 2, 1999; Updated December 3, 1999