Court Ruling Makes QEO Law 'Even Worse'
A Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling involving the Qualified
Economic Offer law will harm the quality of education in schools, and
it takes away yet another teacher right, according to WEAC President Stan
Johnson.
| Prep time
is an essential element of teaching. Telling teachers they should
find time on their own to prepare for classes is misguided and shows
a lack of understanding of the profession.
--------
Stan Johnson |
The court Thursday (February 28, 2002) decided that
the Dodgeland School District can unilaterally eliminate preparation time
language from the teachers contract and have a QEO.
On a 4-3 vote, justices interpretation that a Wisconsin Employment Relations
Commission decision that teacher prep time is not a fringe benefit
was as reasonable as the unions, and therefore the court would defer
to it.
The court also upheld the WERCs conclusions that
the unions proposal to pay teachers if they were denied prep time
was an economic issue and cannot be arbitrated.
This ruling makes a bad law even worse,
Johnson said. The QEO law unfairly singles out teachers for what
amounts to a salary cap. The Supreme Court is now saying preparation time
is not an important element of teaching.
Johnson said the decision is especially troubling because
it shows how the QEO law can be twisted to cause economic and professional
harm to members.
The court took away one more right from teachers,
Johnson said. School districts can now eliminate a major benefit
without meaningful bargaining. This will have a serious impact on teacher
morale and the quality of education in our schools.
Johnson said the ruling in effect tells teachers not
to bargain for educational quality issues, because districts can take
them away.
Prep time is an essential element of teaching,
Johnson said. Telling teachers they should find time on their own
to prepare for classes is misguided and shows a lack of understanding
of the profession.
Justice William Bablitch, writing a dissent on behalf
of three justices, challenged the majoritys conclusions.
He argued that the WERC added provisions to the QEO
law to create a win-win situation for employers and was an
unreasonable interpretation of the law.
Administrative agencies are making the QEO as
restrictive as possible, he said. The Supreme Court is now
backing their decisions without considering the merits of the case. This
ruling tells teachers not to care about kids - just care about money.
Resource page
on the Qualified Economic Offer law
Posted March 1, 2002