![]() |
|---|
| Subcommittee recommends repeal
of QEO
The Qualified Economic Offer law should be repealed
and replaced with "a system that both teachers and administrators
agree will encourage teachers to further develop their teaching
skills." That is one of dozens of initial recommendations
submitted to the Governor's Task Force on Educational Excellence
this week (March 30, 2004). The task force's four subcommittees issued their
recommendations to the full group for consideration after several
months of research and discussion. "The subcommittees studied and debated the
issues with a great deal of public input," WEAC General Counsel
and task force member Bruce Meredith said. "The full task force
will now review the ideas and develop a package of recommendations
to submit to the governor later this year." The Teacher Issues Subcommittee report states,
"It is clear that the current teacher compensation structure
is designed exclusively to hold down costs and provides no incentive
for either teachers or school boards to improve instructional quality."
The report also said the QEO has caused morale problems for teachers. The subcommittee did not reach consensus on specific
changes to the system, but agreed that the QEO should be eliminated.
"Increasing teachers' knowledge and skills
related to their teaching responsibilities will improve pupil learning,"
according to the report. "Linking teacher salary increases
to teachers' acquisition of knowledge and skills better promotes
this goal than a system based exclusively on length of service and
credits earned." "WEAC has long advocated for a compensation system that recognizes skills and knowledge, but continues to oppose any system that ties teachers' salaries to student test scores," Meredith said. "Virtually all members of the subcommittee opposed such a system." The subcommittee report also recommended that the state address
increasing school health care costs, "so the growing costs
of fringe benefits do not make the needed improvements in teacher
salaries impossible, or too burdensome for districts and their taxpayers."
The subcommittee recognized that school health care costs were part
of a broader Wisconsin problem of high insurance costs The report said decisions about changes to health care benefits
"should respect the fact that health care benefits have been
established through the collective bargaining process, often at
the expense of higher salaries." The subcommittee also found that retaining teachers is a bigger
concern than recruiting teachers. Members recommended a variety of proposals to increase recruitment
and retention, including $1,500 income tax credits for teachers
who work in high-poverty or low-enrollment school districts; funding
programs such as mentor programs that assist initial educators;
and a grant for master educators in low-income districts to serve
as resources for students, staff and the community. The Academic Achievement Subcommittee focused on barriers to student
achievement in and outside of school. According to the report, "student
achievement is affected by many factors in a child's life, including
what happens in the earliest stages of life before a child enters
school, the child's school environment, the child's health, the
child's home environment, and the child's community. As a consequence,
barriers a child encounters in any of these environments can become
an impediment to academic achievement." The committee identified the most significant barriers to academic
achievement as a child's economic situation and limited English
language skills. "The subcommittee also strongly believes that the school climate,
as influenced by racial, ethnic, and cultural biases among students
and staff within schools can produce serious impediments to student
achievement," according to the report. "Steps must be
taken to address these barriers in order to ensure that each student
in Wisconsin has an equal opportunity to a sound, basic education." The subcommittee is recommending the state:
The Special Education Subcommittee looked for ways to adequately
fund special education, including ways to share costs more evenly
across the state. According to the report, subcommittee members
were concerned about the current level of special education funding,
but decided against making a specific recommendation on funding
at this time. Members agreed that special education funding changes
should be made in the context of reforming the entire school funding
system. It is recommending the state:
The Early Education Subcommittee recommended the state:
Although not directly discussed in the subcommittees' various reporters, Meredith said numerous members expressed concerns about the potential negative impact on quality instruction of the federally imposed Elementary and Secondary Education Act, called the "No Child Left Behind" act by the Bush Administration. All four reports are available online at the official Web site of the Governor's Task Force on Educational Excellence. Posted April 1, 2004 |