Salary Increases Under the QEO
New versus Experienced Teachers Verona as
an Example
| Step |
BA |
Step |
MA+24* |
Step |
MA+30* |
| ('94-'95) 1 |
$22,908 |
15 |
43978 |
16 |
46493 |
| ('95-'96) 2 |
$24,135 |
15 |
44769 |
16 |
47786 |
| ('96-'97) 3 |
$25,132 |
15 |
45091 |
16 |
48359 |
| $ Inc. |
$2,224 |
|
$1,113 |
|
$1,866 |
| % Inc. |
9.71% |
2.53% |
4.01% |
| |
* Includes longevity |
NOTES: '96-'97 is a new salary schedule. A "new"
teacher in the BA lane received both a step increase and the per
cell increase associated with the new schedule. Teachers at step
15, however, only received the per cell increase associated with
the new salary schedule because they already were at the maximum
step.
This district has 295.5 FTE (full-time equivalent) teachers.
Of this, 131 positions are at the maximum step in their
respective lanes. Sixty teachers are at the maximum step in
the MA+30 lane, which is the highest lane for the district.
Inflation has been running just under 3% annually for the last
three years.
Senior teachers are penalized the most under
the QEO. They receive significantly lower increases in pay than
those who are able to gain annual step increases. |